Archive for May, 2016

DEALING WITH FINANCIAL CONCERNS: Is the Selling of Naming Rights Okay?

This column has to do with the selling of naming rights to ballparks, athletic facilities, and so on.

Now, we all know that at the professional league, it’s become pretty standard fare for enterprising corporations to put up a lot of money to have their firm’s name branded on a  ballpark. Hence, we have, for example, in the NY-NJ-CT area, MetLife Stadium….or Citifield, places like that. Famous ballparks that have sold the “name” rights to their stadium.

It’s all about generating more cash, of course, and as a result, our athletic facilities have more commercialized.

In truth, think we’ve gotten to a point in our society where sports fans everywhere have pretty much accepted this as a way of life. That is, if an insurance company or a bank wants to put up millions of dollars to have their corporate name on a building, we’re okay with that. After all, this is professional sports, and pro sports are big business.

But let me ask you this…

Would you be okay if your local HS football stadium or your HS gymnasium or baseball diamond had its naming rights sold? Just like they do at the professional level?

This is not a case where a school district is simply dedicating a field or ballpark to honor the contributions of a beloved local coach or athlete. Instead,  this is where – and let me use a fictitious name here – where your local HS football field or basketball gym is officially re-named, say, Chico’s Bail Bonds Stadium.

Naturally, Chico’s Bail Bonds would have to pay a decent amount of money to do this. And in fact this selling of naming rights to HS facilities is becoming more and more common around the country.

Local schools say it’s an excellent way to generate revenue streams for the school district, that the monies can be used to help provide new equipment or other needs for the students. And besides, there’s already a lot of precedent for selling naming rights with local professional minor league or major league fields.

Of course, certainly when it comes to sponsoring youth league teams in our towns, like in Little League, we all know that local barber shops and deli’s or gas stations routinely put their company name on the kid’s caps and shirts to sponsor the team. Just like Chico’s Bail Bonds…from the movie, Bad News Bears.

So let me ask you this…..is there any downside to having your HS sell the stadium or gym or ballpark naming rights to a corporate entity….or is this actually a brilliant and smart idea?

I read recently where a public HS in Indiana sold the naming rights to its football field for $400,000 to a local bank. Other naming rights have been sold to a car dealership for the baseball field, the softball field to a law firm, and its concession stands to a tire and auto care shop.

My question to you….do you have a problem with this? Would you care if it happened in your school district? Or with money tight for sports these days, would you absolutely welcome this kind of economic development?

Now, remember, this has nothing to do with HS booster clubs, which are pretty much run outside the realm of the school board. Booster clubs, of course, are comprised of sport parents who raise money independently to help their kids who play HS sports….

But the naming rights to a school building or facility has to be approved by the school board. And if HS football fields have their naming rights sold, should we expect to see the HS auditorium, or science labs, or even the library or cafeteria carry a local sponsor’s name?

Callers this AM were mostly likely in favor of this trend, simply because school districts have so little money these days that any kind of financial stream is welcomed. We all knows that schools are constantly looking to cut back, not add services. And if an outside entity wants to pledge a lot of money to have their signage on a HS field, well, why not?

Of course the school board has to have the final say in all, so that the sponsors are all legitimate and above reproach. As one caller said, there’s a school district in NJ where apparently the name rights on the HS football field is by a local race track. The caller wondered if that made sense to have a horse track where people actively gamble made sense for a HS of kids under the age of 18.

Deep pocketed Sports Parents?

And while I think selling naming rights is fine, I can foresee some situations where things could get tricky.

Suppose a highly successful attorney pledges to buy the naming rights to the HS football field, putting up, say, $1 million to be paid over ten years. That’s great. His law firm’s signage would be on the stadium.

But also suppose the attorney has a son in 8th grade who aspires to be a starter on the football team, and the attorney is very eager to see his son’s dreams come true.

You see my concerns. You can practically anticipate what can happen next.

So, the bottom line is that the extra cash for naming rights is great, but it’s always essential for the school board to totally do it’s homework so that there are no potential conflicts in the near future.

SPORTS PARENTING TRENDS: More and More Youngsters Are Quitting Sports Because They Sense They’re Not Good Enough…

 A New Canadian Report Holds Lessons For American Youth Sports

By Doug Abrams

In early May, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) wrote a series of articles about Sport & Belonging, a new report that spotlights excesses that mark many youth sports programs in that nation. The report’s influence should not stop at the border because similar excesses mark many youth sports programs in the United States.

In both nations, many sports programs conduct travel or elite teams for players at younger and younger ages. Programs ramp up the pressure by creating longer seasons, and by dismissing greater encroachments on family life. Programs tolerate cutting or benching of youngsters judged less talented by coaches who are ill-equipped to make such profound judgments about elementary school children. Pressure leads some parents and coaches toward confrontation, violence, or other misconduct. About 70% of youth leaguers quit by the age of 13, often burned out from too much adult pressure imposed too early.

Pressures on Youth Leaguers

The new report was prepared by Vital Signs, in partnership with the True Sport Foundation. (Vital Signs is a network of more than 190 community foundations devoted to enhancing the quality of life throughout Canada; the True Sport Foundation advances fairnessexcellenceinclusion, and fun as the core values of sport for Canadians of all ages.) The report’s researched findings about the nation’s youth sports programs include these:  

3 out of 4 children and youth ages 5-17 are active in sport, but participation rates peak at age 10 to 13 and then decline steadily and dramatically with age”;

In Canada and globally, 5- to 19-year-olds say lack of enjoyment, feeling they are not good enough to play and an increase in family and intrapersonal stress were the most common reasons for dropping out of sport”;

“[T]he most important factors in sport drop-out rates include lack of fun, stress, too much competition and negative coach or parental behavior.”

Sport & Belonging also reported that a bulk of Canadians believe that the nation’s youth sports programs give short shrift to values. “4/5 believe that promoting positive values in youth should be a priority for sport in Canada, but fewer than 3/5 believe community sport currently reinforces them.” Not only that, but “almost three-quarters (73%) of Canadians say children’s sport has become too focused on winning at the exclusion of fun and fair play.”

Pressures on Parents

CBC Sports writer Jamie Strashin places much of the blame on an environment that leads kids as young as eight to quit because “they think they’re not good enough” when they are cut from a travel or elite team that is driven by “the hyper-competitive environment that lords over most youth sports.” A North Vancouver youth soccer coach told CBC News writer Gavin Fisher that scheduling too many practices and games can kill many kids’ passion for sport by the time they reach their early teen years. “If your child is playing more games than an NHL player,” says the coach, “you seriously have the balance wrong.”

Sport & Belonging also finds that youth sports can exact a heavy toll on Canadian parents themselves. Despite the demonstrated benefits of lifelong physical exercise, sports “[p]articipation rates for adults are dropping in every province,” and “7 out of 10 Canadians aged 15 and older . . . do NOT participate” actively in sports at all. Among the nation’s adults, the shift “from player to spectator at amateur events . . . almost doubled from 24% to 40%” from 2006 to 2010.

A suburban Toronto physician offered Strashin this reason for the drop: “People often tell me, ‘Doctor, I don’t have time to exercise. I’m too busy taking my kids to sports. . . . The emphasis on kids’ sports has completely wiped out parents’ ability to keep themselves healthy.”

The “Youth Sports Arms Race”

By spotlighting the physical and emotional toll on players and parents, Sport & Belonging raises provocative questions about the potentially harmful effects of the escalating “youth sports arms race.” Many parents today are too young to remember the Arms Race that pitted the United States against the Soviet Union during the Cold War from 1945 until the Soviet state dissolved in 1991. The Arms Race was fueled by mutual fear of falling behind. When one nation built X nuclear warheads, the other nation would respond by building X+. Year after year, each nation would continue stockpiling more armaments to maintain perceived superiority.

Many adults today similarly fear that “if the next town’s team played 40 games for six months last year, our team had better play 50 games for seven months this year, or else our kids will fall behind.” Or that “if Johnny and Susie down the street get expensive private coaching, then our Billy and Mary must get it too, and maybe for more hours a week.”

Youth sports seasons can consume six months or more, plus playoffs and tournaments. “The big machine doesn’t stop eating until it has chewed up all twelve months of the calendar year,” says former NBA player Bob Bigelow, who has spoken about youth sports reform to audiences in the United States and abroad for nearly 30 years.

Many youth teams play too many games. In my 42 years as a youth hockey coach, our teams never played more than about 30 games in seasons that ran from early October to the first week or so in March, including playoffs in many of those years. I doubt that playing 60 games rather than 30 would have produced players twice as talented. The Law of Diminishing Returns suggests that a 53rd game would not have honed skills, but that it would have encouraged burnout, increased the risk of overuse injuries, and intruded unduly on academics and other aspects of family life that the parents also valued.

With about 70% of kids dropping out of sports by the age of 13, our youth hockey program’s negligible or non-existent dropout rates each year (even among teen players) suggested that our robust but reasonable game schedule “kept the fires burning.”

Over-indulgence comes with a price. In his excellent book, Just Let the Kids Play, Bigelow quotes former San Francisco Giants baseball player, Erik Johnson:  “I see a lot of burnout. It used to be high school, but now it is ten-, eleven- and twelve-year-old kids. The kids get fried.”

A More Wholesome Balance

The new Vital Signs report comes on the heels of polling data that suggests that many American parents would welcome a more wholesome balance between their children’s organized sports and other aspects of family life. For example, a nationally representative poll of parents, released early in 2014 by espnW and the Aspen Institute’s Sports and Society Program, found that “seven in ten parents have concerns about both the time commitments and rising costs of participation in youth sports.”

The espnW-Aspen poll reaffirms findings reported a year earlier in a poll conducted by the online market research company uSamp at the request of i9 Sports, a youth sports league franchise that stressed one-day weekly commitments, local play without long-distance travel, and focus on fun.

Sixty-eight percent of mothers responding in the uSamp poll said that their children’s youth sports involvement causes stress in their lives; 51% said that this involvement causes stress for the whole family. Twenty-four percent of mothers said that this involvement causes conflict with their significant other, and 24% said that they have resented their children because sports consumes too much time.

Of mothers who reported sports-induced stress, 87% blamed scheduling conflicts, including five-night-a-week commitments. Sixty-seven percent cited cost, and 53% said that their children’s sports deprived the family of holidays, weekends and free time. Seventy-six percent said that they are happy when the sports season is finally over.

A Silent Majority?

Rick Wolff reported on recent shows that, according to the Wall Street Journal and other sources, participation by 6-12-year-olds in team sports has declined since 2008 in the United States. No one reason alone likely explains the decline, but perhaps growing numbers of kids are turning their backs on artificial pressure as growing numbers of parents see youth sports moving in an essentially unhealthy direction.

When a hesitant parent sees other families fueling the youth sports arms race, the parent may feel guilty about being the “only” one who considers saying no. Each family must reach its own decisions about participation, pressure, burnout, and family balance. But polling data suggests that parents who want to slow the arms race have plenty of company. In some places, these parents may even be the Silent Majority.

Postscript. . . . Sport & Belonging also warrants attention because it stresses reforms designed to open sports to children other than ones discussed in this column, who have had the opportunity to participate. These reforms, also described by the Aspen Institute and other thoughtful American sources, include overcoming the chronic under-representation in the youth league ranks of such children as girls, at-risk youth, youth with disabilities, racial and ethnic minorities, and children from low-income families. In the United States and Canada alike, parents and coaches and league administrators should take these reforms seriously.

 

Sources: Vital Signs, True Sport Foundation, Sport & Belonging 6, 7, 16 (2016); Gavin Fisher, Too Many Practices and Games Are Killing Youths’ Enthusiasm For Sport, Coach Says, CBC News, May 11, 2016; Jamie Strashin, Why Your Kids’ Sports May Be Bad For Your Health, CBC Sports, May 11, 2016; Jamie Strashin, No More Joiners: Why Kids Are Dropping Out of Sports, CBS Sports, May 19, 2016; Bob Bigelow, Tom Moroney & Linda Hall, Just Let the Kids Play: How to Stop Other Adults from Ruining Your Child’s Fun and Success in Youth Sports (2001), pp. 97, 113; Tom Farrey, ESPN Poll: Most Parents Have Concerns About State of Youth Sports, espnW.com (Oct. 13, 2014); i9 Sports Survey – Moms Stress Over Sports (2013); Brooke de Lench, Balancing Sports and Family: 13 Tips for Parents, http://www.momsteam.com/successful-parenting/balancing-sports-and-family-13-tips-for-parents .

 

DANGERS OF THROWING TOO MANY FASTBALLS: A New Study Suggests Max Effort Causes Injuries

Last week, as you may recall, I interviewed Jeff Passan, the author of new bestselling book, THE ARM. And if there was one major takeaway from that show, it was that the world of pitching —  and trying to prevent arm injuries —  has never been more complicated.

And now, in yesterday’s NY Times, there was yet a new report released: – a study from the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit – which had these conclusions:

> About a quarter of all current major league pitchers have had Tommy John surgery. No matter how look at that stat, that’s a lot.

> And that this new study says that serious arm injuries  are due to throwing too many fastballs.

But there’s an important key here that should not be overlooked. It’s not that just throwing too many fastballs is the issue. Rather, this has to do with pitchers throwing fastballs at their maximum effort, regardless of whether they top out at 95 mph or 85 mph or 75 or whatever. In other words, all that matters is that they were throwing with their maximum effort, not just that they were throwing fastballs.

I think that’s a very important distinction which may get lost in media translation. Let me quote:

“Pitchers who throw at their maximum speed, whatever that speed is, they’re hurting their arms…”

That comes from Dr. Robert Keller, the leader on the study. And it’s significant, because he’s saying, in effect, that your son is throwing as hard as he can all the time in games, he’s running a good chance of getting hurt. That’s opposed to young pitchers learning how to change speeds with their fastballs, or to pace themselves during the course of a game, and only unleashing a full max pitch every so often.

And to me, that makes a lot of sense. That’s big takeaway….coaches need to openly remind young pitchers NOT to throw every fastball at max effort.

WHAT ABOUT CURVE BALLS?

It also suggested in this study that throwing curves DOES NOT make a difference in arm injury – at least among major leaguers. But Dr. Keller also added said that these findings DO NOT apply to LLers because their mechanics of throwing curves are not well developed or honed at young ages. In other words, he sidestepped the issue of whether curves may hurt young arms since he was only studying the data of major league pitchers.

I think that’s significant as well.  And until Dr. James Andrews changes his stance on the dangers of throwing curves until you’re old enough to shave, I would caution your kids not to throw curves.

DANGERS OF THROWING CURVE BALLS: An Interview with Jeff Passan, Best-selling Author of THE ARM

Over the years, I have received lots of requests from my WFAN listeners regarding booking guests for this show, but I have to admit, I received more requests for a book called THE ARM than for any other author.

THE ARM, which is subtitled Inside the Billion-Dollar Mystery of the Most Valuable Commodity in Sports, is a fascinating, definitive, and stunning look at major league baseball and its obsession with not only scouring the world for young pitchers who throw 90-100 mph, but it’s also a detailed look at how fragile these young arms are, and are so susceptible to injury — especially Tommy John surgery.

The book is written by Jeff Passan, who by day is a popular baseball columnist for Yahoo Sports. THE ARM It’s a frightening, fully investigative work, and should be mandatory reading for any parent, coach, or kid who aspires to pitch in baseball.

I had so much ground to cover with Jeff on the show that I pre-taped the show this week. For starters, I asked Jeff why is there so an obsession these days for scouts to find pitchers who throw 90-100 mph. That is, it wasn’t that long ago that top pitchers in the majors, like Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine, won by changing speeds, hitting corners of the plate, and fooling batters. Even knuckleballers don’t throw hard.

Jeff answered this rather bluntly. “In truth, it’s a lot of hard work to develop a pitching style like that — to change speeds and fool hitters.  It’s just much easier these days to find a kid who throws hard.”

I have to admit that I think there’s a lot of truth in Jeff’s assessment.

WHEN WILL LL BASEBALL WAKE UP?

But more than that, I drilled him about the dangers of kids throwing curves. Even in his book, on page 262, he quotes Dr. James Andrews, the noted surgeon when it comes to arm injuries, saying once again that “kids shouldn’t throw curve balls until they’re old enough to shave.” In my world, that means around 14 or 15 years old.

But as I have observed for years, kids in LL Baseball throw curves by the time they’re 10, and especially are on display in the LL championships. This is in direct conflict with Dr. Andrews’ advice – even though he’s on the LL Advisory Board – and his wise advice is even posted on the LL website.

LL Baseball in the last few years has tried to pivot away from this issue, and now says that kids hurt their arms by throwing too much at full max. Everybody knows that and agrees with that – that’s not news – but to ignore the curve ball concern seems ludicrous and dangerous.

Passan said he was planning to meet with the LL Baseball folks in Williamsport soon to try and get them to finally provide some clear and straightforward advice for parents and coaches and kids. Here’s what I would personally recommend:

Tell kids NOT to throw every pitch at full max power. That’s a sure fire way to hurt your arm at a very early age, and will lead to surgery.

Tell kids NOT to throw curves or sliders until they are 14 or 15 and their arms have had a chance to grow and be stronger and become more developed. If Dr. Andrews is telling the world about the dangers of curves, and he does more Tommy John surgeries on teenagers than anyone, I would believe him — not LL Baseball.

Tell parents whose kids have a strong arm to be judicious about how many days they pitch in a row for various teams. Pitch counts are smart, especially if kids are attempting to throw hard each and every day. 

Finally, I happened to stop by the local HS baseball field yesterday afternoon, and a kid from Rye HS named Kirby was pitching. 6-4, 190 lb, smooth-throwing righty. And not surprisingly, there were half a dozen major league scouts in attendance to see this young man. All the scouts had radar guns, and on each pitch they would note the speed (fastballs were reaching 90 mph), and then they would write the speed down in their notebooks.

By all consensus, this pitcher will be a top draft choice – mainly because he has a gifted arm. I just hope somebody in pro ball teaches him how to really pitch, e.g hit spots, change speeds, and develop a change-up.

 

TRENDS IN SPORTS: Are HS Sports Programs Going to Fade Away Due to Travel Teams?

Today’s WFAN show focused on what happens next when HS athletic directors find it more and more difficult to hire qualified coaches. As discussed last week, there is such an exodus of talented coaches out of HS programs that school districts are really discovering that it’s a challenge to find –  and keep – good coaches.

Along these lines, I asked the listeners today to come up with solutions to this issue OR whether the rise of travel and club teams are simply going to erode HS programs to the point where school districts will stop offering sports entirely. They’ll just tell parents that if their son or daughter wants to play sports, then just go out and find a travel program.

Most of the callers were distressed by this prediction, but they all acknowledged that this was a growing concern. These were some of the suggestions to stem the tide:

1 – Should schools pay more in terms of salaries for coaches? Maybe the school’s booster club can chip in more dough for these coaches? Would more pay help stem the tide?

2 – Or should a school board set up a brand-new position – someone who acts as a liaison strictly between the parents and the coaches? That is, the parents can go to that individual with their issues and concerns  — and just leave the coach and the AD out of it? Would that work? Hire someone as a professional buffer?

Remember, this exiting or migration of coaches stems from the harsh reality that parents everywhere continue to intervene and meddle with coaches. They just feel it’s their right to do so, and despite endless warnings not to do this, the trend only continues.

3- One caller, who said he was a long-time lax coach, said that he took care of any parental concerns by appointing his senior captains to handle any and all complaints from the players as well as the parents. The coach talked with the captains everyday, and found that this approach worked very well.

He also made it clear, though, that he worked very hard to make everyone of the team feel included; that is, he made it a point to get everybody into every game, even if only for a few minutes in the first half, so that every kid felt that he contributed to the team’s success. He also made sure in practice that the second and third tier kids got plenty of reps with the starters.

This coach’s approach made a lot of sense to me. True, it takes more work. But he said that in 18 years of varsity coaching, he had only two parents ever complain to him. To me, that’s remarkable in this day and age.

4 – Here’s another suggestion, although a radical one: should a school board really begin to debate whether just to give up on school sports altogether?  Tell Moms and Dads that if you kid really wants to play sports in middle school and HS, then the time has come to find an outside travel program – because this school is going shut down all sports.

This is what is done pretty much everywhere around the world except here. I often refer to it as the European model, as HS over there don’t offer varsity sports programs. If you want to play sports, you simply play for an outside club team.

I think the simple and harsh reality is that we’ve reached a point where parents are not going to change their ways; if they feel compelled to talk with the coach, they are going to continue to do that.

So if the parents aren’t going to back down, or change their ways, what I’m suggesting is that perhaps the time has come to find better ways to allow parents to channel their concerns.

Think about that…because that’s what’s happening everywhere.

So, if we just get rid of all HS sports programs, and just tell parents that if your son or daughter wants to play sports, then just find them a travel team. The truth is, I think you might be surprised at how many people will like this idea.

Why? Because for the most part, most sports parents who think their kids are going to be great athletes are already doing this. 

Think of it.Parents can then negotiate their own deals with the travel team officials. You could contract for more playing time for your kid, a particular,  uniform number, and so on. The sky is the limit.

And make it part of the deal that the travel team coach has to talk with you, the parent, whenever you want.

Sure, having your kid on a travel team might cost more of your pocket than a HS team, but think of all the bonuses:

Guaranteed playing time, better competition, more exposure to college coaches.

I will tell you that no caller advocated this approach. Nor do I. But maybe, whether we like it or not, this is going to happen.

OBNOXIOUS SPORTS PARENTS: Why HS Coaching Positions Go Unfufilled

What Can Happen When Parents’ Abuse Chases Away Coaches

 By Doug Abrams

The other day, a want-ad of sorts appeared on the computer screen while I was reviewing youth sports articles in the nation’s newspapers. The want-ad was longer than the few-inch ones that typically dominated newspaper classifieds and now appear regularly on Internet sites. In the Portland (Maine) Press Herald, Steve Craig wrote a lengthy, well researched article below this headline: “Help Wanted: Maine’s School Administrators Struggle to Find Coaches.”

The article reported that each year, school districts in Maine and other states suffer high turnover among middle school and high school coaches. In some schools, as many as a quarter of coaching positions open up each year. “Long termers,” men and women with coaching tenures measured in decades rather than months or a few years, seem a dying breed in the United States today.

A Sense of Entitlement

School districts frequently get few applicants — and sometimes none — for advertised openings, even varsity positions. The Press Herald offers several reasons why. The bulk of interscholastic coaches have traditionally been teachers, but greater classroom obligations today leave less time to juggle coaching with family and other personal commitments. Coaching a high visibility sport can demand a 12-month-a-year commitment from teachers and non-teachers alike. Non-teachers may find it difficult to fit afternoon practice and game schedules with their “day jobs.” Coaching stipends remain modest for the hours expected.

But time constraints, year-round commitments, unyielding team schedules, and modest stipends do not tell the whole story. The media also regularly reports about high school and middle school coaches who are driven out of coaching because of unrelenting abuse from some of their players’ parents. The executive director of the Maine Principals’ Association told the Press Herald that “many parents have a sense of entitlement,” and that “some parents apply pressure . . . that makes coaching less attractive.” “As the head coach, everything you do is questioned,” added one high school head lacrosse coach.

School coaches indeed face serious challenges from some parents. When confronted by insistent parents, for example, administrators may countermand the coach’s disciplinary decisions. Unable to recruit, public school coaches typically depend on players developed in local youth leagues, but a coach’s reappointment each year may turn more on parents’ satisfaction with the team’s win-loss record than on the coach’s demonstrated ability to lead the team to its potential by getting the most from the players who try out.

In the community and before the school board, coaches may suffer sniping from parents whose real beef is that their children are not in the starting lineup. In the Record-Eagle (Traverse City, Mich.) in mid-April, sportswriter Chris Dobrowolski reported seeing parents’ “intimidation, harassment, threats and heated verbal exchanges” leveled at their children’s coaches. He says that abuse from parents “happens all the time.”

Face-to-face confrontations create trouble enough, but social media now leaves coaches fair game for parents emboldened by the anonymity of the keyboard. Just last month, the St. Paul (Minn.) Pioneer Press reported the resignation of the girls hockey coach at Stillwater Area High School near St. Paul. In 14 years behind Stillwater’s bench, he had compiled a 260-112-21 record and won two state titles, though the team finished 9-16-1 last season. The coach said that he resigned to protect his family from “an unrelenting and vicious personal series of verbal attacks from a group of parents” in emails and on social media. “I will simply not put my family through any more of this.”

The Pioneer Press reported that the Stillwater team’s booster club attributed the personal attacks to “a disgruntled few” parents of current and former players.

Chasing Away Qualified Officials

In my most recent column on Rick Wolff’s blog, I discussed how parents’ verbal and physical abuse can hurt players by driving away some the most qualified referees and other game officials. Particularly in contact and collision sports, shortages of experienced officials can increase the risk of injury because many replacement refs are not yet ready for the responsibilities cast on them. But for the premature departures of so many veterans, many of the replacements would not yet be on the field. http://www.askcoachwolff.com/2016/04/20/abusive-sports-parents-growing-shortage-sports-officials/

Chasing Away Qualified Coaches

Now the Portland Press Herald reminds us that abuse from some parents may also claim qualified head coaches and assistant coaches. Abrupt coaching changes do not usually implicate player safety, but players can lose out on valuable expertise and leadership when qualified coaches depart prematurely and the array of potential replacements remains thin.

In school districts that draw coaches from the ranks of both teachers and non-teachers, we can debate the general virtues of each category. On the one hand, a teacher-coach may combine knowledge of the game with an educator’s keen sense of pedagogy and motivation. A teacher-coach can also help supervise the team off the field because teachers are on the campus throughout the school day rather than only shortly before practices and games. On the other hand, a non-teacher may combine a greater background in the sport with a similar ability for pedagogy and motivation, sometimes drawn from years as a high-level player or an effective youth league coach.

In any school, however, each coaching selection depends on its own personalities. Teacher-coaches range from effective to ineffective, and so do non-teacher-coaches. But one way or the other, players are more likely to be hurt when abuse dished out by some parents leads coaches to quit before their time, leaving the applicant pool with only a few names, or even (according to the Press Herald) with none. Completing a double whammy, further hurt can await in games played without the most qualified referees, whose ranks some parents have also helped deplete.

Coaches chosen from deeper applicant pools are more likely to meet players’ needs and expectations than coaches chosen after school administrators must go begging for candidates to stem persistent high turnover. A buyers’ market remains more likely to produce better coaching selections than a seller’s market.

 

Source: Steve Craig, Help Wanted: Maine’s School Administrators Struggle to Find Coaches, Portland Press Herald, Apr. 25, 2016  http://www.pressherald.com/2016/04/24/help-wanted-maines-school-administrators-struggle-to-find-coaches/; Chris Dobrowolski, Parent Behavior Toward Coaches Must Change, Record-Eagle, Apr. 17, 2016; Jace Frederick, Stillwater Girls Hockey Coach Resigns After “Vicious” Verbal Attacks, St. Paul Pioneer Press, Apr. 8, 2016; Jace Frederick, Stillwater Girls Hockey Boosters Decry “Disgruntled Few” Who Attacked Coach, St. Paul Pioneer Press, Apr. 13, 2016.